Search for: "State v. Dougherty" Results 121 - 140 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Ball State University (Granted )Docket: 11-556Issue(s): Whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Faragher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Ball State University (Granted )Docket: 11-556Issue(s): Whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Faragher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am by Susan Brenner
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:38 pm
(PPHS)—the operator of Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital—would substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in the inpatient general acute-care hospital services market in Georgia’s Dougherty County and surrounding areas. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:39 pm by Jenna Greene
What made the deal tricky is that the purchaser ("a straw man" according to the FTC) was technically the Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, and government entities are generally exempt from antitrust scrutiny under the state action doctrine. [read post]
  The court began its analysis of the state-action doctrine by citing the seminal case of Parker v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Erie County trial court case of Boyd v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by James R. Marsh
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in Dougherty v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
” According to the FTC, the acquisition would eliminate competition between the only two hospitals in Albany and in Dougherty County. [read post]