Search for: "State v. Drew" Results 21 - 40 of 3,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:13 am
It sounds like the memo drew such criticism that they regretted sending it, and now, we're supposed to believe they never intended to distribute it. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the House and Senate would have better records than Hamilton about House and Senate officers who drew compensation from the legislature. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
As this Reuters article points out, the defendants drew a very favorable panel comprised entirely of Democratic appointed judges. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm by Matthias Weller
In its judgment of 8 February 2024, the CJEU had to decide whether “the application of the Brussels Ibis Regulation be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
I think that Sotomayor drew a fair implication from the brief, but it was never stated expressly. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
The Amars did entertain the possibility that the Framers drew a "civil/military distinction" among different types of officers. [read post]