Search for: "State v. Duran" Results 21 - 40 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Issues regarding the use of statistical evidence at trial of a class action were recently addressed by the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, in Duran v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
")The dynamic duo (Uelman and Graham, not Kennard and Baxter) also awarded Justice Corrigan their award for the best majority opinion of the year (Duran v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/9Fjeq0Qwo5 -> I Duran Duran Loses Case, Brought In Britain, Over American Copyrights https://t.co/dCRYz0o46f -> CBS Sues YouTuber for Posting Episodes of 'The Andy Griffith Show' https://t.co/iv2mgYPiTI -> New PIPEDA Finding exposes transparency challenges in state access to personal information https://t.co/4bn7ZGsXNI -> Who Will You Nominate for the 2016 Clawbies? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Court extensively quoted its decision in Kelly v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
§ 23.9     Impact of Death of Plaintiff After Verdict  The Case: Duran v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm by NARF
(CERCLA; Natural Resources Damages) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Tiffany South v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
She stated Estrada was sleeping in the room he rented in Highland Park around 6:30 a.m. on May 19, 2014 (the same time as the robbery), when she arrived to bring him food.People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Bush, he said, affirms that Guantanamo detainees have a right of discovery to relevant exculpatory evidence, and federal courts have followed that precedent in habeas cases, including Duran v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]