Search for: "State v. EDP" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 3:06 pm by Rob Robinson
As such, they stress the need to clarify the relationship between the provisions in this Proposal, the ones in the GDPR and Member State law and also with ongoing European initiatives. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Lisette Mustert
The Executive Director revealed that Europol acted beyond its powers by processing large datasets from several Member States which included personal data of individuals not linked to a criminal activity. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:59 am by Cody M. Poplin
Yesterday, DataGuidance and Sidley Austin LLP hosted a live Q&A wilth Giovanni Buttarelli, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), to discuss the state of play following the European Court of Justice's decision in Schrems v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age Discrimination in… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Although Supreme Court had granted  NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Although Supreme Court had granted  NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]