Search for: "State v. EPA" Results 41 - 60 of 3,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2022, 12:39 am
Instead, its stated reasons were cursory and often at odds with EPA’s own prior assumptions and statements. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 1:45 pm by Evangelina Cantu
In the EPA’s August 29 news release announcing this new rule, the EPA said, “The amendments issued today are limited and change only parts of the 2023 rule that are invalid under the Sackett v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm by WIMS
For support, Petitioner relies mainly on a prior EPA order where the EPA held that a state agency had failed to adequately respond to a petitioner's comments. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Shari Shapiro
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by WIMS
On June 12, 2012, EPA approved the Minnesota Regional Haze State Implementation Plan. [read post]