Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 81 - 100
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 11:17 pm
Pensions The pension value must be stated. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
For example, an ex-spouse can claim future earnings (eg see the case of Wyatt v Vince), so it is important to include a ‘clean break’ clause in any divorce settlement to prevent this potential outcome. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
In Sisvel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
Courts applying the no-confidence-in-an-iniquity/public interest defence in confidence need to weigh the public interest in preserving the confidence against the public interest in allowing the information to be shared (see eg, ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329, [22]). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Recognition of non-state law? [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:56 am
A perfect example of this is the case of Molloy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 2:57 am
(Petitioner) v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 2:57 am
(Petitioner) v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 2:57 am
(Petitioner) v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:38 am
However, all other tenant fees included in the original tenancy agreement (eg check out fees) will cease to be payable on 1 June 2020. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
As I have had occasion to observe more than once on this blog (eg, here and here), Collins is fatally flawed. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:59 am
As readers know, this is a profoundly un-harmonized area of the law, and different approaches are in place across different EU Member States. [read post]
