Search for: "State v. Emmett"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
The report, co-authored by Pomona College economist Bowman Cutter, UCLA Law’s Emmett Center fellow Rhead Enion, Emmett Center Executive Director Cara Horowitz and me, focuses on the extent to which the cap and trade program has created conditions of liquidity and transparency in order to avoid the potential for gaming the system. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
However, before State Street Bank v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:37 am
SourcesFirst instance ruling in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010) hereAppeal decision in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2011] FCAFC 23 (24 February 2011) here [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:24 am
Emmett Murphy denied Westchester’s motion, summarizing the relevant case law as follows: 1. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:28 am
Like its federal counterpart, Minnesota Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1) provides that For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted only if the crime (1) was... [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
Emmett C. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
Fawsett, visiting from the federal district court in Orlando, said the majority opinion failed to allow claims over the type of conduct that reasonable people had come to expect they will be protected from in the workplace.The case was Corbitt v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:07 am
(2 lens combination) Case: Keller v LED Technologies Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 55 Venue: Full Federal Court Judges: Emmett, Besanko and Jessup JJ The Main Design Issues Does the Designs Act 2003 change the manner in which a court is to have regard to the state of the development of the prior art base? [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:28 pm
Authors from across the country each take on a famous labour case in a series of case studies, from early cases about constitutional jurisdiction (Snider; John East), though picketing classics (Hersees; Harrison v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:28 pm
Under Brady v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
Emmett J held it did not: 17. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Richman pointed us to a federal statute called the Hyde Amendment, which, according to this 2005 Second Circuit opinion in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:01 pm
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved http://lawprofessors.typepad.com:80/adjunctprofs/Spanierman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:10 am
Precisely because it came on the heels of the Supreme Court's 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:03 am
Spanierman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:32 pm
In Emmett v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The Court, by an apparent vote of 6-3, lifted the stay in application 07A304, Emmett v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 7:37 am
Emmett. [read post]
