Search for: "State v. Encarnacion" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:40 am
Jose Gonzalez Gomez and others v Encarnacion Gomez-Monche Vives and others [2008] EWHC 259 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 50 “The words ‘as beneficiary’ contained in art 5(6) of Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, which provided that a person domiciled in a member state could, in another member state, be sued ‘as … beneficiary of a trust’, required the claimants to show that they were suing a party in its capacity as… [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKSocial Services LawPlaintiffs Fail to Show Social Security Administration Violates Disability Assessments Encarnacion v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since Crawford was decided, courts have struggled to come up with a comprehensive definition of the term "testimonial," but one factor that must be considered is the degree to which a statement is deemed accusatory, i.e., whether it seeks to establish facts essential to the elements of the crimes as ruled in People v Encarnacion, Melendez- Diaz v Massachusetts and People v Rawlins. [read post]