Search for: "State v. Engel" Results 101 - 120 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Carr (1962), recognizing judicial review of legislative apportionment; Engel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:17 am by Ana Badour
 In addition, further to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice case Engel Canada Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:53 am by WSLL
Engels, Assistant Attorney General.Representing Appellee (Petitioner): Gerard R. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), on Friday, March 30, 2018 Tags: Board oversight, Cash flows, Cybersecurity, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Firm valuation, Leverage, Market reaction, Privacy, Public firms, Risk management, Risk-taking, Shareholder value, Target firms An Early Look at the State of U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am by Nicholas Weaver
This clearly qualifies as "metadata" under Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see,  inter alia , ECHR rulings  Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
One year later, the Supreme Court decided Mazars v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
When House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Eliot Engel subpoenaed documents the State Department had given to Republican-controlled Senate committees, the department refused, citing the standards in the Mazars case for the proposition that Engel’s request was politically motivated and thus the subpoena was invalid. [read post]