Search for: "State v. Epps"
Results 261 - 280
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
The narrative frame for the article is the ACLU's lawsuit, Presley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps observes that the court’s decision in The American Legion v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Next is Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
Epps, 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
” Briefly: Noting in his column for The Atlantic that “state legislatures in the Bible Belt are openly flirting with laws designed to thwart any Supreme Court decision requiring recognition of gay marriage,” Garrett Epps urges the Court “to say forthrightly that when any agents of the state—legislators, judges, clerks—discriminate on this basis, they violate both the Constitution and their oath. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
In Madison v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
Epps, No. 07-70042, 2007 WL 3121824 (5th Cir. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
In Ortiz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Four years later, the Supreme Court revisited the issue in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
Brackeen, which rejects a series of challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act, and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
