Search for: "State v. Epstein" Results 101 - 120 of 682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 8:35 pm
Tolub of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, ruled on June 24 in AVA a/k/a Maximilia Cordero v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:02 pm
Genentech; CAFC Decision in MedImmune v. [read post]
Employment issues to consider while awaiting decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) will imminently release its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and if the final ruling is consistent with the recently-leaked draft opinion (overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey), employers may soon need to contend with a variety of novel employment… [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am by Epstein Becker Green
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Jim Epstein; coverage here of the NYT’s 2015 nail salon reporting embarrassment] Silliest claim about proposed salary-history-inquiry bans is that they would advance “transparency” in hiring [Seth Barron] Many states complicate offender re-entry after incarceration with needless licensing barriers and fingerprint checks [Eli Lehrer, Inside Sources] H.R. 1180 (“Working Families Flexibility Act of 2017”), introduced by Rep. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
But with the case hanging in the balance, and the Supreme Court’s decision last year overturning Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm by Richard A. Epstein
  Each begins with the sensible assumption that the law as stated in Wickard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:21 pm by Lauren Koster Beaver
  Luckily, in the recent published decision (precedential) Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm by Ilya Somin
Unfortunately, this lesson has been lost on the New York courts in River Center, LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court decided the notorious Hawaiian land redistribution case, Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]