Search for: "State v. Erich" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am by Florian Mueller
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 5:25 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
In this case, Erich Sorenson was arrested without a warrant on the doorstep of his apartment. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
The court ruled that such concerns were best tested by “[v]igorous cross- examination [and] presentation of contrary evidence,” not by its wholesale preclusion. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am by Tobias Thienel
The scenario, then, was reasonably similar to that in the famous Alvarez-Machain case (see Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004)). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
But Member States do not enjoy them: the rationale of fundamental rights is to protect individuals from the State, not vice versa: "If the State were able to invoke its individual rights, other than the public interest, in order to limit fundamental rights, the result would be the destruction of those fundamental rights. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
Cuomo sexually harassed multiple women, including current and former government workers, breaking state and federal laws and engaging in a pattern of unwanted touching and inappropriate comments, according to a much anticipated report from the New York State attorney general, Letitia James, released on Tuesday. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 8:37 am by Florian Mueller
In fact, the moment he impressed me the most was when he conceded, in a Samsung v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
No, not at all: "Patents in Telecoms" is a lean, mean conference where the organisers can confidently state: "Most key players will be there in audience if not as speakers". [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]