Search for: "State v. Evergreen District Court" Results 81 - 100 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2015, 7:30 am by Robert Kreisman
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois once they were served with plaintiff’s complaint and sought an injunction to stay the plaintiff’s state court action for attorney fees and costs. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:59 am
Davis, 360 N.E.2d 765, 767 (Ill. 1976), or alternatively to join such a claim with her federal claim in her federal suit, thus invoking the district court’s supplemental state-law jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The overriding problem with Bison’s claims of malpractice based on defendant’s failure to produce an expert on junk bond “evergreen” fees is that, as stated by the district court and affirmed by the Second Circuit, Wells’ own October 15, 2004 letter to ATP articulated the terms of the parties’ agreement, which was that fees were owed for any transaction prior to the twelve-month period following termination… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
  The court was much influenced by the declarations from ten competitors in the market, that stated that they used similar exclusive dealing contracts with “evergreen” renewal provisions, as used by the defendants. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-6 Title: District Attorney’s Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm glad to see that, because I expect the Second Circuit will affirm the District Court decision, and thus set a precedent that will be binding in the Second Circuit and likely quite influential in other circuits as well. [* * *] From Volokh v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Greg Mersol
” More importantly, citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Two related rescheduled cases, The Evergreen Association, Inc. v. [read post]