Search for: "State v. Fabian" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Register here.NARA transcribes documents from United States of America v. [read post]
 The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
The intermingling of Industry 3.0 and 4.0 represents the state of matters in the current period of digitalisation of work. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
Article IV also clearly states that such decisions are to be taken by the Ministerial Council in accordance with the specific requirements for “decision-making” in the WTO Agreement, or in any of the covered multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Consider the case constantly referred to in decisions this year by courts at both the state and federal level: Jacobson v. [read post]
Lopez, Tax Rulings and State Aid: Now or Never, in Guest State aid blog, 27.11.2014, accessible at: https://www.lexxion.eu/en/stateaidpost/tax-rulings-and-state-aid-now-or-never/. [read post]
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am by Irene Marchioro (University of Bologna)
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]