Search for: "State v. Fagan " Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am by MBettman
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by David Fagan
By David Fagan and Sumon Dantiki Recently several media outlets reported that the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) sent a letter to many of the nation’s banks, regarding the “level of insight financial institutions have into the sufficiency of cybersecurity controls of their third-party service providers. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:09 pm by Bexis
  We also felt that way while we were involved in the Fagan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Dan Markel
  This directly confronts the legacy of McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:06 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  The United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, reviewed Fagan's civil complaint sua sponte (i.e. on its own, without any party filing a motion). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm by Clayton Perkins
Skepnek, of The Sader Law Firm, of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kevin Babbit, of Fagan & Emert, LLC, of Lawrence, Kansas won in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by MBettman
  The criminal charges against Andrew Foley and Fagans were dismissed, and the charge against Evan Foley was resolved. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:23 am
I am pleased to report that the Fall 2008 issue of the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law is now  available on-line here, and it includes a number of  terrific pieces. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Saylor, C.J., Concurring) (Wecht, J., Concurring), handed down by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the court expressly overruled the long-followed 12-year-old Commonwealth Court decision in Fagan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts Australia Darwin v Norman [2020] NSWSC 357, Fagan J awarded two men who were part of a commune AUS$200,000 damages for libel against a blogger. [read post]