Search for: "State v. Fair" Results 101 - 120 of 30,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2021, 7:25 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — State’s motion to reopen case — Right to fair trial In 2001, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County found the appellant, Jerome Fleming, guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:20 am by Riley Macdonald
Supreme Court Rules Google’s Copying of Oracle’s Java SE API is Fair Use Google LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
Nov. 30, 2018) The post Fair Use for “Meme” Can’t Be Decided on Motion to Dismiss—Philpot v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:14 am by Kevin Smith
A convoluted copyright infringement case that was decided earlier this month – Latimer v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 8:37 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The recent case of the Federal Court of Canada, Chapman v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 975 (CanLII) involved the issue of procedural fairness in the context of a disciplinary investigation. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:22 am
Section V contends the FET standard is a prominent example of a boilerplate provision. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 8:25 am by Lee E. Berlik
The fair report privilege seems to come up more frequently in federal court than in state court. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
Thus, although not required for a finding of fair use, the Supreme Court has stated that transformative works “lie at the heart of the fair use doctrine’s guarantee of breathing space within the confines of copyright. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by MBettman
On August 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:54 am by Jeremy
If yes, is the scheme compatible with that provision where the total amount allocated via state resources to fair compensation for private copying has to be set within budgetary limits established for each financial year? [read post]