Search for: "State v. Farley" Results 41 - 60 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state court agreed, and when the case was removed to federal district court (because the parties are citizens of different states), the federal court inherited the seal. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Najah Farley argues that a ruling in favor of the employers in Epic Systems v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
PeerJ Preprints 5:e3100v1 doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v1 , peerj.com/preprints/3100v1/ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. (2017) The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am by Ron Coleman
I was speaking to a thoughtful, insightful person last night who asked me, “What if Simon Tam wins in Lee v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
In my humble opinion, the Law Professors Amicus Curiae brief filed on November 6, 2016, by Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University Washington College of Law and Professor Rebecca Tushnet of Georgetown University Law Center, make this and other points quite well. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]