Search for: "State v. Feather" Results 41 - 60 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
In reaction to Nacchio’s attorney expressing surprise at the judge’s ruling to exclude the expert witness, Judge Nottingham stated in open court that if anyone would have told him that Nacchio’s attorneys would be surprised by his ruling, “you could have blown me over with a feather. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm by ACLU
This case changed high school athletic programs throughout the state and guaranteed parity. ● Spiering v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:00 am
Cos did not help her financially.The Tenth Circuit applied United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of The Constitutional Rights and Interests Of Children in Support of Respondents in Masterpiece Cakeshop LTD, et al v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
This modern “rational basis” review originated in the 1955 case of Williamson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:03 am by Alex Craigie
You probably saw this coming, but it’s worth stating. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:57 am
While it’s not quite analogous, I was reminded of a passage from United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Dennis Crouch
 Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm
Criminal Defense (Florida): Maricopa County: An American Embarrassment Gamso - For the Defense (Ohio): Sheriff Joe and the Second Amendment People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
LEXIS 41243 (ED WI, June 5, 2007), a Wisconsin federal district court permitted a prisoner to proceed with his First Amendment, RLUIPA and state law claims growing out of a prison official's taking a federally protected Eagle feather from plaintiff, who is an enrolled member of a federally recognized Indian tribe.In Thaxton v. [read post]