Search for: "State v. Fender"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
In Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:19 am
The Panel in Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:02 am
In the recent case of Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
But in the matter of the state of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Compare Posey v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:46 am
The recent case of Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:45 pm
In the other criminal justice opinion issued by SCOTUS today, a 6-3 court held in Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Accordingly, “juvenile offenders cannot with reliability be classified among the worst of- fenders. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:17 pm
Link: Berland v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm
Plus Products v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Precedential No. 13: TTAB Axes Fender Guitar Shapes, Finding Them Generic or Lacking Acquired DistinctivenessOwnership:Pam Chestek Ponders the Transfer of Common Law Trademarks under State LawTTAB Affirms Rejection of SOU filed by Assignor After AssignmentTTAB Resolves Santana's Ownership Dispute, But Pamela Chestek is DissatisfiedTTAB Finds No Trademark Rights in OEM Who Applied "WASTEMAID" Mark at Others' DirectionPriority:Precedential No. 16: TTAB Throws New… [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:29 am
Although the defendant in State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Stuart Spector Designs, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:10 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Lunn, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2082 (03 September 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BMW AG & Anor v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 1028 (29 August 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Birch v University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2008] EWHC 2237 (QB) (29 September 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Fender (Administrator of FG Collier & Sons Ltd) v… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
