Search for: "State v. Ferreira"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm
*** The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York’s ” ‘special duty’ requirement” applies “to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence” or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality’s negligent “failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee” (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:03 pm
The Court similarly rejected Ferreira de Sousa’s argument that the United States human rights principles bar the return of A.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
Leah Platt Boustan (UCLA, Department of Economics), Fernando V. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:18 pm
ACORN v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 12:10 am
Now, in Ferreira v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Ferreira v Portugal App No 41696/07 (21/12/2010) [Link is to judgment in French, the only available version. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Ferreira v Portugal App No 41696/07 (21/12/2010) [Link is to judgment in French, the only available version. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 am
Galindo & Ferreira Corp. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Gottfried, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:24 pm
Gottfried, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:13 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "Contrary to the [Plaintiff's] contention, [Plaintiff] failed to allege that the Town voluntarily assumed a special duty to him beyond that owed to the general public, citing Maldovan v County of Erie, 39 NY3d 166, and Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "Contrary to the [Plaintiff's] contention, [Plaintiff] failed to allege that the Town voluntarily assumed a special duty to him beyond that owed to the general public, citing Maldovan v County of Erie, 39 NY3d 166, and Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:24 am
Facts: This case (Ferreira et al v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:02 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:02 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Ferreira, SJC-10902. [read post]
