Search for: "State v. Fips"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 10:18 am
EPA has already stated that if Texas does not submit a revision by this date, EPA is prepared to promulgate a new FIP associated with the SIP Call, which would replace the May 3rd FIP, but be "fully consistent" with it. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:01 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals considered several issues with respect to cash-assistance benefits under the Family Independence Program (FIP) in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 9:08 am
<> Arizona DEQ v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:11 am
Both states requested summary judgment for an order setting deadlines by which the EPA must promulgate FIPs for these defaulting states. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
The model was properly employed at both the time of the state SIP and the proposed FIP. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:18 am
EPA has already stated that if Texas does not submit a revision by this date, EPA is prepared to promulgate a new FIP associated with the SIP Call, which would replace the May 3rd FIP, but be "fully consistent" with it. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
After Mass v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Circuit, see, e.g., Michigan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
The majority of states only require notification in the “most expedient time possible” or “without unreasonable delay. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Circuit, see, e.g., Michigan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:57 pm
The dissent's analysis on the FIPs issue conflates (i) EPA's rejection of certain States' SIPs and (ii) EPA's decision in the Transport Rule to set States' "good neighbor" obligations and emissions budgets and simultaneously issue FIPs. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am
It relies on state-specific data to identify each state’s contribution to nonattainment or interference with NAAQSs maintenance in other states and uses this information to create a state-wide emissions budget and an enforceable FIP designed to reduce emissions in the state below that budget. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
(No. 12-1182), and American Lung Association, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
However, in North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:20 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
