Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 8,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
The court is arguing that Congress cannot get around First Amendment requirements of judicial review by redefining what forms of judicial review are permissible. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
Therefore, the relevant factors weigh in favor of transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern Division of Maryland in Greenbelt issued its first ruling Friday granting a defense motion to suppress a warrantless blood test as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
The rejection of a qualified First Amendment access right to these judicial records should be reviewed and promptly reversed because it conflicts with the rulings of this Court and the unanimous view of other state and federal appellate courts that the access right applies to these types of judicial records. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm by Edward Foley
First, at the beginning of the 20th century, in a case involving allegations of ballot-box stuffing in a Kentucky gubernatorial election, Taylor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Obstruction of Justice Under United States v Aguilar appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:08 am by Andrew Brasher
The post Symposium: A recipe for continued confusion and more judicial involvement in redistricting appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
The post Federal judge strikes down Louisiana state electoral maps, orders districts redrawn appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed September 17, 2015, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and finding that a proposed land exchange agreement was not statutorily exempt from CEQA review. [read post]