Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 121 - 140 of 8,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm by Jeff Gittins
Haik then appealed the district court's decision to the Utah Supreme Court.The Supreme Court first analyzed whether Mr. [read post]
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 25, 2022, the League of California Cities (“League”) and California State Association of Counties (“CSAC”) filed a 10-page letter with the California Supreme Court requesting it to depublish the First District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:53 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Because the issue involved a key state law, the First Circuit chose to ask the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court in that state, to provide its opinion on the question of whether the FTC Rule preempts the state’s independent contractor law. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Ryan Sharkey
In determining whether Congress implicitly precluded federal district court jurisdiction, the court must first determine if preclusion is discernable from the text, structure, and purpose of the statute. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
“no substantial basis” test allows parsing and dismissal of portions of a single claim, and at least one federal district court judge altering the Supreme Judicial Court’s test significantly as applied to anti-SLAPP motions filed in federal court to avoid Seventh Amendment jury right problems.And 2017 already promises to continue the life-of-its-own trend of anti-SLAPP litigation.Be warned, this is a long post.Spoiler Alert: The… [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
“no substantial basis” test allows parsing and dismissal of portions of a single claim, and at least one federal district court judge altering the Supreme Judicial Court’s test significantly as applied to anti-SLAPP motions filed in federal court to avoid Seventh Amendment jury right problems.And 2017 already promises to continue the life-of-its-own trend of anti-SLAPP litigation.Be warned, this is a long post.Spoiler Alert: The… [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
District Court for the Northern District of California, the Court upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) practice of denying patent reviews due to looming trials in district court. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Rucho v Common Cause: Supreme Court Rules Courts Can’t Solve Partisan Gerrymandering appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:24 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
CLS Transportation case, the California Court of Appeal’s First Appellate District has affirmed a trial court’s holding that an arbitration clause categorically proscribing class and representative actions is unconscionable. [read post]