Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 8,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 2:12 pm
In 36th District Court v Michigan American Federation of Sate, County and Municipal Employees, the Court of Appeals decided several issues arising out of arbitration between the 36th District Court and AFSCME over the chief judge’s decision not to re-appoint four judicial officers. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Auxer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm
(California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
The result of the district court’s injunction is thus not to resolve a political dispute through judicial fiat, but rather to throw that dispute back into the political and administrative fora where it belongs. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Portnoff v Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, 2017 WL 708745 (E.D. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia resolved the DOJ's motion in two steps. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Carter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court held in Monaco v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
The district court granted that motion. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:27 am
– Judge Bonnie Sudderth, 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:58 am
" The district court observed that in Rein v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:48 am
In a decision and order dated December 23, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected the Mother's contentions and ordered that the children be returned to Poland. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 2:28 am
First, it had asked whether EAWs were defective for the purposes of the Extradition Act 2003, s 2(6)(c) if they failed to give particulars of the domestic warrants issued in the category 1 to enforce that judgment or order within the issuing state. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Although it did not fully address this question, a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pipino v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
“no substantial basis” test allows parsing and dismissal of portions of a single claim, and at least one federal district court judge altering the Supreme Judicial Court’s test significantly as applied to anti-SLAPP motions filed in federal court to avoid Seventh Amendment jury right problems.And 2017 already promises to continue the life-of-its-own trend of anti-SLAPP litigation.Be warned, this is a long post.Spoiler Alert: The… [read post]
