Search for: "State v. Flanagan" Results 41 - 60 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
 There is a report of the hearing on the 5RB website (which erroneously states that it was on 22 March 2015). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
This appeal arose from a challenge by O’Shea’s–Baxter, LLC, d/b/a Flanagan’s Ale House (“Flanagan’s”) to an order of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“ABC Board”) upholding the Louisville/Jefferson County Government’s (“Louisville Metro”) denial of Flanagan’s application for a retail drink license. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
This appeal arose from a challenge by O’Shea’s–Baxter, LLC, d/b/a Flanagan’s Ale House (“Flanagan’s”) to an order of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“ABC Board”) upholding the Louisville/Jefferson County Government’s (“Louisville Metro”) denial of Flanagan’s application for a retail drink license. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, the Supreme Court ruled that the states are required to provide legal counsel to criminal defendants who are unable to pay for their own defense. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
For the past six years, Maricopa County’s NAD event has been the largest adoption day in the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Flanagan’s [Queen's law Dean] views. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am by Robert Brammer
Fischer (2005, 2011) Thinking Like a Writer: A Lawyer’s Guide to Writing and Editing, by Steven V. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]