Search for: "State v. Fleetwood"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am
O’Donnell v Fleetwood Park Corp. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:50 am
As Justice England stated in Ingram v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Co-op Owner Campaigning for Board Seat Wins Access to Unredacted Shareholder List The Second Department’s decision last week in Matter of O’Donnell v Fleetwood Park Corp. involves a residential co-op with 478 units in Yonkers, New York. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
At this hearing the judge also stated that based on NRG v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:57 am
I like cake.State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
“Although an account stated may be based on an express [*2]agreement between the parties as to the amount due, an agreement may be implied where a defendant retains bills without objecting to them within a reasonable period of time, or makes partial payment on the account” (Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; see Fleetwood Agency, Inc. v Verde Elec. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
“Although an account stated may be based on an express [*2]agreement between the parties as to the amount due, an agreement may be implied where a defendant retains bills without objecting to them within a reasonable period of time, or makes partial payment on the account” (Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; see Fleetwood Agency, Inc. v Verde Elec. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 681, 974 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dep’t 2013); Drapaniotis v. 36-08 33rd Street Corp., 48 A.D. 3d 736, 853 N.Y.S.2d 356 (2d Dep’t 2008; Sager v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 681, 974 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dep’t 2013); Drapaniotis v. 36-08 33rd Street Corp., 48 A.D. 3d 736, 853 N.Y.S.2d 356 (2d Dep’t 2008; Sager v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:41 am
” California v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:57 pm
His introduction of the untimely, unexplained, and unsworn-to photocopies of bills, checks and credit card statements are inadmissible to evidence entitlement to summary judgment (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Seidman v Industrial Recycling Props., Inc., 52 AD3d 678 [2008]; see also CPLR 4533[a]; Daguerre S.A.R.L. v Rabizadeh, 112 AD3d 876 [2013]; Matell Contracting Co., Inc. v Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 AD3d 681 [2013]). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
Fleetwood Logging Co., [1963] B.C.J. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
