Search for: "State v. Floyd Y."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Wade y acá Doe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
Significantly, in the present cases Kitchin, Floyd and Sales LJJ went a stage further than Bibi and decided that if X adopts the identity of Y, where Y is a false identity created by X and X acquires the characteristics needed to obtain citizenship by using the identity Y, the purported grant of citizenship to X as Y is a nullity. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:37 am
Well, a case named Morales v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:26 am
El oficial Struble pertenecía a la unidad canina K-9 del estado y andaba con un perro llamado Floyd. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
Scott, 116 F.3d 137, 140 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1997); Floyd v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:59 am
The case in question, decided by Mr Justice Floyd yesterday in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
One such legal battle was seen in the state of North Carolina, in Soc’y for the Hist. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
” (quoting Iowa Supreme Ct.Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Floyd Y. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:03 pm
Shoemaker, eds., State Historical Soc'y of Mo., 1938). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Pol'y 361 (Winter 2005 ) 2004 and earlier David R Clay, Federal Attraction for the interstate class action The effect of Devlin V. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Pol'y 361 (Winter 2005 ) 2004 and earlier David R Clay, Federal Attraction for the interstate class action The effect of Devlin V. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm
El Pais now reports that “acting in opposition” to the Fiscalía (think of it like our District Attorney), a higher state authority (the State Bar which defends the interest of Spain’s Treasury) wants the case to proceed. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Floyd v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
" That seems pretty clear, since Section 2412 says that it does not "alter[ ], modif[y], repeal[ ], invalidate[ ], or supersede[ ] any other provision of Federal law which authorizes an award of such fees and other expenses to any party other than the United States. [read post]
