Search for: "State v. Foley" Results 221 - 240 of 656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 4:28 pm by Record on Appeal
The unanimous opinion authored by Judge Foley (presiding) is available here. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
Professor Edward Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) recently posted a piece entitled "The Future of Bush v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am by Derek T. Muller
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by James Romoser
City of Philadelphia (Leslie Griffin, Verdict) On Fulton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:25 am by Bill Otis
"Many conservatives have criticized Nebraska and Oklahoma for being "fair-weather federalists" because their claims hinge, in part, on Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:28 pm by Christian Stegmaier
Foley's fall was a result of mistakenly walking into the wrong doorway as opposed to tripping on the bucket or mop.The Wintersteen v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Foley, a similar case that is also pending in her courtroom: Should a state statute mandating sealing of certain court documents apply when the case is removed to federal court? [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
In other Public Defender news, the 9th Circuit blog has a post entitled "Gonzales: DOJ agrees Ninth Circuit precedent on minor offenses is flawed" and that the Department of Justice has conceded that the Ninth Circuit should grant rehearing en banc to correct United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
The landmark California Supreme Court case on the issue of existence of implied employment contract is Foley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Rev. 1479 (2008) Erwin Chemerinsky, Washington v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]