Search for: "State v. Frames" Results 101 - 120 of 6,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:07 am by Atty. Branden Bell
Appellate counsel framed this is as a discovery order issue when it should have been framed as a Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm by JT
Tsatskis v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:11 pm
  Stating that the non party had not been helpful in framing search terms (read–reducing their own costs), Judge Peck split the continue… [read post]