Search for: "State v. Freitas" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
There may be some other way in which the hypothetical ordinary reasonable reader would identify him/her: Economou v de Freitas [2017] EMLR 4, [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016) [9] … 21. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm by Xandra Kramer
Article 7(1)(a) Brussels I-bis states that, for contractual matters, jurisdiction is vested in the Member State in which the contract is to be performed. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm by Xandra Kramer
Victoria Sahani (Professor, Arizona State University) approached the issue of TPLF from the perspective of arbitration, both commercial and investor-State arbitration. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
ON 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of United the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB). [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  Warby J’s approach was endorsed by the Court of Appeal (Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 – see our blog here). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The existence of a ‘public interest’ defence The Court of Appeal set out the law as it stands following the case of Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA 2591 (at [44] – [48]) as well as identifying the relevant principles for determining the meaning of “public interest” (at [33] – [35]). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Two recent decisions, Economou v de Freitas and Doyle v Smith, provide some guidance on this question, but seem to pull in slightly different directions. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has commented on decision in the case of Economou v De Freitas which provides guidance on what constitutes a matter of public interest as a defence (pursuant to s.4 Defamation Act 2013) in defamation cases. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]