Search for: "State v. Freitas" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The trial in TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department began on Monday 20 June 2016 and was completed on 23 June, with judgment being given on 24 June 2016. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm by Xandra Kramer
Victoria Sahani (Professor, Arizona State University) approached the issue of TPLF from the perspective of arbitration, both commercial and investor-State arbitration. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
  A copy of the judgment can be found here [pdf] Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Economou v De Freitas, heard 13-17, 20, 22 June 2016 (Warby J). [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States The Washington Times reports that a judge has ordered a deposition by Fusion GPS in the libel case brought by Aleksej Gubarev against Buzzfeed. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States The Washington Post notes that Amazon is revolutionising its delivery system, allowing for delivery to individuals parked vehicles. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
ON 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of United the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB). [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The National Magazine considers the state of defamation law in Canada. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  Warby J’s approach was endorsed by the Court of Appeal (Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 – see our blog here). [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2016, Warby J heard a PTR in the case of Economou v de Freitas. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On Monday 13 June 2016, the trial in Economou v De Freitas began before Warby J. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]