Search for: "State v. Freund" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Specifically, defendants’ receipt and retention of plaintiff’s accounts, without objection within a reasonable time, and agreement to pay a portion of the indebtedness, gave rise to an actionable account stated, thereby entitling plaintiff to summary judgment in its favor” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626, 559 NYS2d 249 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Madison (1803), Ex parte McCardle (1869), and City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
"[The doctor] did not create Freund's painful mental disorder and his traumatizing social isolation," The ruling in Greenberg v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
As we begin a week of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626 [1st Dept 1990].) [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  “Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Larry O'Dell, Associated Press Writer, Richmond, Va. wrote about a recent Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, Stroud v. [read post]