Search for: "State v. Friesen"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Valley Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
Friesen asked to borrow Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
Friesen asked to borrow Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:14 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm
The Manitoba Court of Appeal recently released a decision in R v Letkeman, which reviewed the non-custodial sentence imposed on an RCMP officer. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:05 pm
Friesen of the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 articulates the various serious and potentially life-long consequences associated with sexual violence against children; the distinct harms of the child luring offence and its full gravity animates the governing sentencing principles and informs their constitutional status. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
It can be of particular significance where it reflects insight and a reduced likelihood of offending in the future: R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para 165; R v Ambrose, 2000 ABCA 264, 271 AR 164 at paras 71, 83. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
– Associated Press and fair use (Spicy IP) Copyright office: Copyright royalty judges have subpoena power over non-witnesses (Copyright Litigation Blog) International law: Wrestling the dead hand of history – Panel on Nazi looted art (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court E D Pennsylvania: $20 million copyright infringement jury award upheld in case concerning filched sales materials later used to poach clients: Graham v Haughey… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm
Reasonable Justification The Supreme Court in R v Natarelli,1967 CanLII 11 (SCC) indicated that the ultimate burden of persuasion is on the Crown to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of any reasonable justification or excuse. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm
Reasonable Justification The Supreme Court in R v Natarelli,1967 CanLII 11 (SCC) indicated that the ultimate burden of persuasion is on the Crown to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of any reasonable justification or excuse. [read post]
