Search for: "State v. Funk" Results 161 - 180 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The Draft Data Privacy Framework for International Personal Data Transfers From the European Union to the United States (2023), CiTiP Working Paper 2023 Funk, PhD, T. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 10:18 am by Nedim Malovic
However, the exercise of that freedom may be subject to restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, with regard to (among other things) the rights of others.As a matter of principle, it is important to recall that the ECHR regulates a state's obligations to individuals and does not have a direct effect on the civil liability in proceedings between individuals.When it comes to criminal liability for copyright infringement, the European… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Matter of Austin ZZ v Aimee A, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 624156, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
" Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Charging the parties with acting more like children, throwing tantrums, teasing and name-calling, Justice Grossman, in his decision in L.T. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
“When an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on appeal… An objection to evidence on the grounds of prejudice or relevance cannot be raised for the first time on appeal” Akers v. [read post]