Search for: "State v. GC" Results 1 - 20 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Nuno Calaim Lourenço describes Printeos v Commission: Importance Of Equal Treatment And Duty To State Reasons In The Calculation Of Fines On Mono-Product Undertakings. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:23 am by Elena Chachko
In both cases, the GC concluded that the Council had infringed article 1 of the 2001 Common Position and breached its obligation to state reasons under EU law. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Should this be true, the GC stated, Nike would have initially owned the Spanish non-registered trade mark at issue and no transfer of ownership from DL Sports would have taken place. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm by Steven Porzio and Elizabeth Dailey
In further support of her position that certain Players at Academic Institutions are statutory employees under the Act, GC Abruzzo cited to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by CMS
That decision was challenged by BAI, one of P&O’s competitors, and the GC annulled the Commission’s decision on the grounds that it had misinterpreted the State Aid rules (Case T-14/96 Bretagne Angleterre Irelande (BAI) v European Commission). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:30 am
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on the parameters of additional insured coverage called Suffolk Construction Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:35 am by Seth Borden
In the letters, Acting GC Solomon cites Linden Lumber Division v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
An article in Friday's Recorder, "Heller Lawyer Named GC at California Department of Insurance" (subscription), had some interesting commentary by Lisa Perrochet on the Fairbanks case and the CLRA: In another development Wednesday affecting the insurance industry, the state Supreme Court agreed to hear Fairbanks v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
The GC made references to case law both in favour and against taking into account the time at which the EUIPO gives its decision on the opposition - in essence, querying whether the fact that an earlier sign (with an earlier right) could lose such status at a later date (e.g. following the possible withdrawal of a Member State in which the mark enjoys protection) would affect the outcome of the case (see by analogy T-598/18 Grupo Brownie decision, para 19).The GC… [read post]