Search for: "State v. Garrett"
Results 321 - 340
of 621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
"In addition, said the court, Fronczak did not present any evidence indicating that DOCS' proffered explanation was a pretext for discrimination.The court's conclusion: After considering "all of Fronczak's claims and finding them without merit," the judgment of the district court is affirmed.* Section 71 of the Civil Service Law provides for leaves of absences in connection with an "occupational injury or disease" within the meaning of the Workers'… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
What Norma McCorvey Believed Matters By Mary Ziegler, Stearns Weaver Miller Professor, Florida State University College of Law Mary Ziegler argues that the recent revelation that Norma McCorvey—the plaintiff in Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
” At The Atlantic (via How Appealing), Garrett Epps hopes the court will summarily reverse a “rogue court [that] has had four chances to apply a foundational First Amendment precedent, and has bobbled it each time[:] That mistake, in a case called Mckesson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
Supreme Court on Monday considered the issue of what types of technology should be eligible for patent protection when it heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
For The Atlantic, Garrett Epps explains why the “whole travel-ban episode,” now on the justices’ merits docket as Trump v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
"In Garrett v Halton Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1017 the Court of Appeal had held to be invalid a CFA where the solicitors had failed to inform the client that they had an interest in recommending an insurance policy. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:14 pm
Garrett, Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Shane P. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am
And Orin Kerr discussed four considerations to supplement his amicus brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:14 am
" NFP civil opinions today (5): G&G Industrial Machining, Inc. and Clifford Garrett v. [read post]
