Search for: "State v. Gaughran"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
However, the decision in Gaughran demonstrates the reluctance of the majority of the court to apply a strict proportionality assessment to measures infringing an individual’s right to privacy, where those measures are considered to fall within the state’s discretion. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
