Search for: "State v. Geier" Results 61 - 80 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
Preemption was still something that didn't happen much in product liability cases.When Geier v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
See, e.g., Geier, 529 U.S. at 882 (state-law tort obligation to install automobile airbags preempted); Cipollone v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
  The first major implied preemption product liability preemption case was Geier v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
This case is particularly interesting because it will allow the Court to reconsider its decision in Geier v Honda (decided in 2000) in which the Court found that a state claim was impliedly preempted by the federal regulations that gave automobile manufacturers the choice to use either seat belts or air bags. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
 . neither an express pre-emption provision nor a saving clause bars the ordinary working of conflict pre-emption principles.Id. at 352 (quoting Geier v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
  For most of this decade, every time the Supremes considered a preemption case, it found preemption Geier v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
(distinguishing the administrative process underlying Geier v. [read post]