Search for: "State v. Gillian" Results 101 - 120 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The right to sue in defamation has been extended to cover trading corporations (South Hetton Coal Co Ltd v North Eastern News Association Ltd. [1894] 1 QB 133), and trade unions (National Union of General and Municipal Workers v Gillian [1946] KB 81). [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:19 am by Gillian Metzger
Gillian Metzger How do we structure an agency to be independent? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
The report later makes reference to the European Court of Human Rights’ (“ECHR”) ruling in Gillian and Quinton v The UK (Application No.4150/05) which held that the power to “stop and search” was a violation of the two defendant’s article 8 rights to private and family life. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:39 am by Kent Scheidegger
" Following the US Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
Further, the girl's mother and owner of the vehicle, Gillian Reynolds, adamantly stated that she would not allow her daughter to drive. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Chief Justice John Marshall noted in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:43 pm by David
§ 48 after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by EEM
The case is assessed in the Human Rights Law Review article, "Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia: The European Court of Human Rights and Trafficking as Slavery. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm by Rosalind English
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:15 am by tjsllibrary
The Anatomy of Torture: A Documentary History of Filartiga v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
First, three matters currently before the Court: In an interview at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Columbia law professor Gillian Metzger discusses Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 8:41 am
Gillian Triggs (Univ. of Sydney - Law) has posted Maritime Boundary Disputes in the South China Sea: International Legal Issues. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Rules on Admission of Uncharged Foreign Crimes in Prosecution of Guyanese Drug Kingpin United States v. [read post]