Search for: "State v. Ginther" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
Defendants met their burden by establishing as a matter of law that they, inter alia, were not negligent and that plaintiff sustained no damages, two essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023, 713 N.Y.S.2d 382), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Ginther v Heim [appeal No. 1], AD3d , 2008 NY Slip Op 7430, 2008 N.Y. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by Madelaine Lane
  The state is alleging the defendant knowingly permitted witnesses to commit perjury at a criminal trial. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Warburg & Co., Inc., 284 AD2d 203, 726 NYS2d 546 [1st Dept 2001]; see e.g., Ginther v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]