Search for: "State v. Glass" Results 41 - 60 of 1,790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
  While the ongoing negotiations in Kyiv, New York, and beyond have generated copious commentary, the regional context of Russia’s invasion is often overlooked or misunderstood, with many analysts taking an unduly negative, glass “half empty” view on the proposed tribunal. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
NO MORE KNOCKING ON THIS DOORJFT was lifting a glass-and-metal door onto a truck when the door fell, causing his hand to be crushed (and finger severed).After a personal injury suit was filed, JFT asked the New York County Supreme Court to find his employer liable for the incident because the latter failed, among other things, to provide an appropriate lifting device as required by New York State law. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm by susan
Redmond v Wiebe Although Redmond v Wiebe, 2022 BCCA 244 is not a contractual dispute matter, a text message chain containing an emoji was considered as evidence and given weight by the Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am by centerforartlaw
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
Benson, V. and Merano, M.A., “Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 1995,” VITAL HEALTH STATISTICS, SERIES 10 (Nat’l Center for Health Statistics 1998). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
., older consumers, children, smart phones v. computer disclosures, etc. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
As a temporary measure, these were replaced with plain glass. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm by Bill Marler
Full summary available online at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP47.pdf Glass, RI, et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm by Frank Cranmer
The High Court judgment is particularly welcome in terms of how explicitly it states that the ECHR requires reading domestic legislation to recognise non-religious beliefs and in how it debunks many of the objections often given for extending protection in this way. [read post]