Search for: "State v. Godines "
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2022, 12:41 pm
Guilty Mind (Mens rea) The mens rea that the Crown must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, to secure a conviction of aggravated assault is: That there was objective foresight of bodily harm As seen in the case of R v Godin, [1994] 2 SCR 484 the mens rea for aggravated assault is objective foresight of bodily harm. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:17 pm
R. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
As Justice Mustang wrote for the Untied States Supreme Court in in the semenal 2010 case of Clouseau v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
Case in point: Hartman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
The cases on asylum seekers referred to above rely on the right to dignity as a way of channelling social and economic rights through the grid of the ECHR and dignity is of course an oft-cited interest in litigation involving discrimination against homosexuals (see Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza). [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
But, once somewhere on the web, Godin stated that his preferred length of email response was three lines. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
Contemplate this at Real Lawyers Have Blogs, which quoted Seth Godin and Scott Greenfield (at Simple Justice) on why worrying too much about "optimizing" a blog for search engine results is misguided: "At some point," said Godin, "you realize you're spending your best energy on optimization, not on creation. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Contemplate this at Real Lawyers Have Blogs, which quoted Seth Godin and Scott Greenfield (at Simple Justice) on why worrying too much about "optimizing" a blog for search engine results is misguided: "At some point," said Godin, "you realize you're spending your best energy on optimization, not on creation. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
In Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza, which Lord Phillips described as the “definitive” case on s.3 HRA 1998, the House of Lords held that s.3 could permit a Court to depart from a provision whose meaning was unambiguous, if that provision was not ECHR compatible, with the dramatic implication that s.3 could oblige a Court to disregard the legislative purpose of subsequent Parliaments. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Blawg Review #213 is all about the community of law bloggers, the tribe, as Seth Godin might call it. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Blawg Review #213 is all about the community of law bloggers, the tribe, as Seth Godin might call it. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
" United States v. [read post]
