Search for: "State v. Goff"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
There will be an application in the case of Decker v Hopcraft on 23 June 2015, an application in the case of Rio Tinto v Vale on 25 June 2015 and an application in Verrai v Goff on 26 June 2015. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
As Lord Goff pointed out this would be a very undesirable situation and not one which can have been intended by the legislature. 62. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Hobbs, (February 7, 2015).Derek Joseph Goff, New Life in the First Amendment: Funeral Protest Statutes after McCullen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:25 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Appeals Court Reverses GSU Copyright Ruling First off today, Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly reports that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court ruling in the George State e-reserve case (Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
The merit decision in State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:45 am
Goff, 985 P. 2d 53 (Colo. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
On copyright, this most prominently includes the case Golan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Today it is recognised across the common law world that a claim for restitution founded on unjust enrichment is founded neither on consent nor on wrongdoing (see for example Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale and Kleinwort Benson v Birmingham City Council). [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Barr v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
The law of nuisance is superior to most state-based initiatives, not because it is organic and home-grown as such, but because it secures our sense of mutual accommodation by allowing individuals to calculate how far they can use their surrounding resources without denigrating the value of their neighbour’s property. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Beer had stated in cross-examination that “there was obviously an agenda” in relation to allegations of corruption. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:12 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday.1: Dotcom Extradition Papers FiledFirst off today, in New Zealand, the United States government has filed paper to have Kim Dotcom extradited to the U.S. for his alleged crimes. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
