Search for: "State v. Grainger"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 9:25 am
Grainger PLC v T Nicholson Employment Appeal Tribunal (Burton J), November 3 2009 – Read judgment The Employment Appeal Tribunal has found that belief in climate change is capable of constituting a “philosophical belief” within the meaning of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (“the 2003 Regulations”). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:47 am
Pattison v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 3:29 pm
In Wald, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Grainger v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:49 pm
Steele v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
One of the most difficult issues in determining whether a view on copyright is protected under the Equality Act is whether it meets the second Grainger criterion, in that it is a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am
In Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4, Burton J had set out the constituent elements of a “protected belief” under section 10 at [24]: the belief must be honestly held, it must be a belief as distinct from an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available, it must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour, it must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance and must… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
Kenneth Boyd, Grainger's loss-prevention specialist, discovered that the order was placed from Grainger's website. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
The judgment As to the Grainger tests: there was no express challenge to the genuineness of Mr Cave’s stated belief; it was more than merely an opinion: “The claimant is articulate about his beliefs, has done some reading and displays relatively well-expressed views about it. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Grainger Plc & Ors v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
Kitchens (Mecklenburg)(Diaz) and Grainger v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:45 pm
The United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit in Holly v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:01 am
Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655 (1993); Lai Ling Cheng v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
The question for the Tribunal was whether Ms Owen had produced sufficient evidence that she held her belief in ethical veganism to the extent required by the Grainger guidelines. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:35 pm
Grainger v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
The Parliament website now states that the Bill has been withdrawn. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 11:15 pm
At a preliminary hearing to determine whether her belief was protected by s.10 Equality Act 2010, the initial Employment Tribunal held that her belief was “not worthy of respect in a democratic society” and, therefore, failed the fifth criterion established in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2009] UKEAT 0219 09 0311. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
