Search for: "State v. Gramm" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Tuan Samahon
United States, a per curiam three-judge district court held that the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act violated the separation of powers because the statute had given the Comptroller General executive powers and Congress previously held the qualified power to remove the Comptroller for cause. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:26 am by Glenn Reynolds
This powerful Article V mechanism has caused Congress to act many times to propose amendments to avoid a convention. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
” “Covered entities” as defined in the Toomey Bill do not include financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or HIPAA-covered entities, which are exempt from the bill’s requirements. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:09 pm by Shelton Abramson
”  S.3333 would not apply to financial institutions that are covered under Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or covered entities that are subject to breach notification requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).The bill contains two basic requirements. [read post]
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:02 am by Adam Levitin
This is actually something that the prudential regulators should address--the OCC permitted captive mortgage reinsurance affiliations in some opinion letters in the late 1990s before Gramm-Leach-Blilely--over the objection of state insurance regulators---and it's an issue the OCC should perhaps revisit.) [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm by Hilary Hurd
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 12:26 am
Vierno Center Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYEvidence The Court States Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Allows Use of Judicial Process to Disclose Information Alpha Funding Group v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
The law does not apply to small businesses (as defined by the Small Business Administration) and along with several categories of personal data that are excluded from coverage under the law, the following entities are specifically exempted: State agencies or political subdivisions; Financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; Covered entities or business associates governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act… [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 2:14 pm
The OCC should be careful what it prays for: it is now crystal clear that it must examine and enforce all preempted state laws against all of the operating subsidiaries of national banks in all 50 states (and to know the ins and outs of those state laws). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
Federal and State Privacy Laws By: Melissa Krasnow   The number and complexity of federal and state privacy laws continue to increase. [read post]