Search for: "State v. Greenberg"
Results 41 - 60
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
From Gannett Media Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:03 pm
United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
Greenberg is now available online. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 8:59 am
The post ERIC GREENBERG, et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:00 am
One example is the case of Feltington v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:40 am
On Sept. 22, Greenberg Traurig attorneys will discuss the latest developments emanating from the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 2:40 am
To warrant such relief, the plaintiff must make a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior” on the part of the defendant attorneys that caused damages (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, in Meredith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
. must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
” “Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989 [2021]; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621 [2018]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2012]; Smith v Chase… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:33 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre-answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
