Search for: "State v. Greenberg"
Results 81 - 100
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:56 pm
Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:03 pm
" and "Has the rise of the Islamic State changed the way we look at jihadist terrorism? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
United States [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
Guzzo v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
See Suisman, Shapiro, Wool, Brennan, Gray & Greenberg P.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Desmukh, Hedy Epstein, Hector Feliciano, Irving Greenberg, Grace Cohen Grossman, Marcia Sachs Littell, Hubert G. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
As no determination had been rendered as of the date of the commencement of this proceeding, the controversy is not ripe for judicial review (see Matter of Arcamone-Makinano v Perlmutter, 196 AD3d 479, 481; Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio, 124 AD3d 73, 86-87, affd 27 NY3d 92; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d at 989). [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
In chapter 16, Marc H Greenberg addresses the case of the Estate of Elvis Presley v Russen and the right of publicity. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
At the Huffington Post, Marcia Greenberger of the National Women’s Law Center discusses the case and argues that “the Court got it wrong in 2001 in Nguyen v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:54 pm
Greenberg, et al., v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
” Greenberg v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
.
Will the Corporate Model Backfire on Greenberg? [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
However, a case which took place in a neighboring state may not be proper to bring in NY. [read post]
