Search for: "State v. Griffith" Results 41 - 60 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Wells C. Bennett
Judge Griffith, seeking clarity, interrupts and asks for a reminder. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:18 am by Editor
State court certified copies of computer printouts of entries reflecting the defendant’s prior criminal convictions was presumptively reliable under FRE 803(8); the mere possibility of error in the computer records was insufficient to challenge their reliability, in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Griffith had the opinion for the court in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am by Lauren Bateman
Griffith, and Senior Judge Stephen F. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Judge Griffith wrote the opinion for the court in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Next, Griffith probes counsel on the issue of the duration of the conflict, specifically in light of the court’s language in Ali v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:53 am
Jane Lambert On 16 July 2015 my heads of chambers, Tim Straker QC and Robert Griffiths QC together with my colleagues, Richard Clayton QC, Charles Morgan, Christopher Forsyth and Lee Parkhill presented our chambers annual judicial review conference. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Holtzman v Griffith  2018 NY Slip Op 04540  Decided on June 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department, aside from its lesson on “account stated” tells us that a legal malpractice claim from a settled divorce action has many hurdles to jump. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:30 am
Writing for a panel that included Judges Tatel and Garland, Judge Griffith explained that the presumption against a treaty-based cause of action (a principle that he finds in the recently decided Medellín v. [read post]