Search for: "State v. Guernsey" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Barclay and others) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1319; [2008] WLR (D) 376 “The Reform (Sark) Law 2008, which, inter alia, provided, in relation to the Island of Sark, a Crown Dependency and a part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, for the Seneschal, the senior judge [...] [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
However, given that the original claim was brought in Guernsey, the Act did not apply and the case fell to be decided on the basis of Guernsey common law. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 4:25 pm
Justice Judson writing for the Court stated at 753:The principle to be applied is that stated in Lord v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
According to the speaker, this right is potentially enforceable in the UK and also perhaps in some US states which provide similar rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:05 am by michael
High Court (Chancery Division) Mahon & Anor v FBN Bank (UK) Ltd [2011] EWHC 1432 (Ch) (6 June 2011) Green (Liquidator of Stealth Construction Ltd) v Ireland [2011] EWHC 1305 (Ch) (20 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabiriizi v HSBC Insurance (UK) Ltd [2011] EWHC 1280 (QB) (20 May 2011) OOO & Ors v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 1246 (QB) (20 May 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Francis, R (on the… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The island of Sark is part of the Crown Dependency of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, with a population of around six hundred. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Later, in Barker v Corus [2006] UKHL 20, the House of Lords decided that each employer was only liable pro rata in respect of the period of time the employee was exposed to asbestos under their employment. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated however that the defence costs are different as they were incurred in defending the claim which had the insurer’s consent. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 10:57 am
But this past April the Court vacated this earlier ruling due to a misapplication of the ratio in 1-800 Contacts v WhenU and has now reinstated the case. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:09 am by tracey
& Ors v Hoey [2011] EWCA Civ 1060 (09 September 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) PD & EB, R. v (Iraq Sanctions) [2011] EWCA Crim 2082 (08 September 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Sofia City Court, Bulgaria v Atanasova -Kalaidzhieva [2011] EWHC 2335 (Admin) (09 September 2011) Mine & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2337 (Admin) (09 September 2011) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hill Country Estates Homeowner’s Association v Guernsey, 2015 WL 2160510 (TX App. 5/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/thirteenth-court-of-appeals/2015/13-13-00395-cv.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Enforcement [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
New York Appellate Division, Third Department: Hastings v Sauve It’s after 1:00 AM. [read post]