Search for: "State v. Guiles" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am by Peter J. Sluka
Services, Inc. v Jupiter Partners, L.P., 309 AD2d 288, 300 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Sismer 35 AD3d 1054, 1056; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon 172 AD2d 254). [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]